Nonsequitur: FBI Director Comey Explains

July 7, 2016

Today FBI Director Comey offered testimony before Congress explaining his recommendation NOT to indict former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

His argument, it seems to me, is that although Clinton was negligent, she did not intentionally break the law.  Gross negligence in handling classified materials is against the law, but Comey believes it is not sufficient reason to charge Clinton based on precendent. (He cites that only one case has been brought forward under gross negligence in 99 years.)


Representative Gowdy, however, pointed out that “false exculpatory statements” can be used to determine intent and consciousness of guilt.  His exchange with Director Comey demonstrates a pattern of these “false exculpatory statements.”

Gowdy shows, it seems to me, that Director Comey could demonstrate intent if he wanted to.  And if that is the only reason not to charge Clinton, he should have done so and indicted.

Even if Comey’s argument of intent is valid, his argument about gross negligence is not. Former Superior Court judge Andrew Napolitano points out that the US government has prosecuted multiple times recently for gross negligence:

The espionage statute that criminalizes the knowing or grossly negligent failure to keep state secrets in a secure venue is the rare federal statute that can be violated and upon which a conviction may be based without the need of the government to prove intent.

Thus, in the past two years, the Department of Justice has prosecuted a young sailor for sending a single selfie to his girlfriend that inadvertently showed a submarine sonar screen in its background. It also prosecuted a Marine lieutenant who sent his military superiors a single email about the presence of al Qaeda operatives dressed as local police in a U.S. encampment in Afghanistan — but who inadvertently used his Gmail account rather than his secure government account.

And it famously prosecuted Gen. David Petraeus for sharing paper copies of his daily calendar in his guarded home with a military colleague also in the home — someone who had a secret security clearance herself — because the calendar inadvertently included secret matters in the pages underneath the calendar.


3 Responses to “Nonsequitur: FBI Director Comey Explains”

  1. […] administration is culpable in the scandals surrounding Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  The FBI determined that no charges should be brought against her illegal use of private email because, although she was negligent, she did not intentionally break the law.  But after reading […]

  2. […] Director Comey declined to prosecute Secretary Clinton although she was grossly negligent in her handling of classified documents and chose to ignore […]

  3. […] not less.  Our government has encouraged citizens to ignore the law, whether it be the former Secretary of State or political protesters or our own children.  The results should not be […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: